The Whole Person Approach to Health Care |
www.wphtrust.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME ABOUT US WHOLE PERSON RESOURCES LINKS SITE MAP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
|
This chapter needs a copmplete re-write, along the lines of the index above, pointing to other chapters where subjects are treated more fully (eg on Placebos, beliefs, spirituality etc) Medicine in the developed world today How are changes made to the medical model? But surely medicine is changing all the time So change is good, how do we influence it? Some models of a whole-person approach Role of counsellors and other therapists Role of chaplains The enlarging medical team Some established models of whole-person care Hospices Burrswood Karis practice in Birmingham Bristol Cancer Centre Research other good models Integrated Health Care Practical issues in applying whole-person principles Value of continuity of care
Attitudes of patients themselves Taking a physical history
Changing beliefs and behaviour I am often asked the question “But how can you change people’s beliefs”. This question is usually asked of me when the people in question have unhealthy beliefs and practices. A recent example was in the Nile Delta region of Egypt where the local women still went to wash the dishes in the Bilharzia infected canal water even though they had good running water in their kitchen taps. The local health visitor found it almost impossible to get these women to change their health behaviour and so prevent the spread of a major disease. So how do people get beliefs in the first place, and then how do they change them? First we need to be clear about the meaning of the words we use. The first distinction is between what people say they believe, what they actually believe and how this affects their actions and behaviour. It will help to first look at the issue of personal beliefs. Personal beliefs Beliefs are the easiest to change – in fact we often change them daily. When I hear a confident speaker I often side with their beliefs, only to change them again when I hear an equally confident speaker argue the opposite view. Beliefs act at the “top” level of our reasoning being, we are normally aware of what our beliefs are, and if pressed we can usually articulate what these are. At the next level down are our personal faith actions. Faith is simply belief put into action. This if we act on our beliefs then we are exhibiting faith. We exercise our faith every moment of every day. We put our faith in many people every day (such as the bus drivers on the D6 bus), and in things such as the electricity in our wires and the engine in our car. Faith is this reinforced and confirmed through experience. If things continue to work, then we continue to put our faith in them. When they fail us – then we lose faith. So I believe that the D6 bus will take me to work – that belief is put into practice by actually getting on the bus (converting my belief into a faith action) and seeing where I end up. If every day the same thing happens and I get to work, then my faith is re-enforced and becomes the deepest level in the belief structure which is conviction. Thus I have a deep conviction that the D6 will take me to work, and every day it actually does so. But what happens if tomorrow the bus departs from its usual route and goes in the opposite direction? I would usually see this as an aberration (a young new driver getting lost) and thus it would not necessarily shake my conviction, or make me lose faith or even change my beliefs. But what if the next day the same thing happened, now I would be worried, and if on a few more occasions the D6 ended up in varying destinations my whole belief system would be upset. I would have changed my belief (that the D6 bus will take me to work), lost my faith in London buses and have no conviction that I could rely on the D6 any more, and I would probably seek alternative methods of getting to work. Thus in this model the beliefs themselves are the least important part of the behaviour forming system. They change easily and sometimes irrationally. Faith kicks in when enough of my beliefs are pointing in the same direction. Let us look at a health example. I have chronic backache and whilst various doctors have tried to help me I am still left with a regular and annoying pain. There is no definite diagnosis and no treatment other than “rest, exercise and losing weight”. Thanks Doc! In discussion with friends I am told of the benefits of acupuncture therapy, and a new clinic has opened in town and many people “swear by” the treatment. A close friend who I really trust has just been to this acupuncturist with backache and he feels much better. Several of my “belief gates” concerning acupuncture will have clicked over to a positive acceptance mode, but not yet enough to take action. There is then a positive article about acupuncture in the Sunday newspaper, and a TV programme in which acupuncture is praised, especially as a treatment for chronic musculo-skeletal pain. Now I have a bad back again, and as enough of my belief gates have clicked, I take the step of converting belief into action, and I put my own personal faith into acupuncture and make an appointment. The next step is very important, because all of the positive belief gates can be instantly negated if I have a terrible experience. I go to the clinic, pay £60 pound, have a painful treatment and then find my backache much worse when I get home. I will have lost faith in acupuncture very quickly, and as the proverb says “once bitten twice shy” it will take a lot of persuading to get me to try again. Thus faith is slowly won and easily lost. After a period of time where my faith is tested by experience, and is positively re-enforced on many occasions, then my faith will be converted into the deepest level of belief which is conviction. A deeply held conviction starts with belief, is converted into faith actions, and then re-enforced into a deep pattern of behaviour through my convictions. These convictions can withstand some negative examples (like the odd D6 bus driver getting lost), but usually stand and can only be changed painfully and with a long period of new experiences. Taking a more regular real life situation closer to home – as a GP I see hundreds of kids with fevers, coughs, colds and upper respiratory infections. It is my belief, faith and conviction that antibiotics are not only useless in most of these infections, but are actually harmful. So you would expect that I would very rarely prescribe them. This belief system has been formed through medical research, teaching by experts and by my own experience. However the mother of the infected infant may have quite different beliefs – and she has real present needs, and so comes to me expecting to be given an effective and quick treatment, and all she has been told has led to her belief that antibiotics are needed. If you are a GP or a parent you may well imagine how the consultation will go. There is a clash of belief systems and one side or the other will have to back down. However if the doctor is good, and is not too rushed he might carefully expound the situation to the young mother, and if he shows that he cares he might begin to flip some of her belief gates into the “antibiotic bad” mode. (please note it could equally well be she the doctor and he the parent!) If this belief is then re-enforced on future occasions, and she trust the doctor she may well come to have faith in no-antibiotics where she would refuse them if offered them by another doctor in the future.
Behaviour
We have already looked at the personal belief system and seen that the deeply held convictions will be one of the most important drivers of behaviour. At times we will seek to put our faith in different beliefs and thus test them out. If they stand the test we will add them to our convictions, but if they don’t we will not allow them to influence our behaviour even though we have not acquired a new set of beliefs. Thus we can be in the situation where we give verbal assent to a belief – but when it comes to the crunch we don’t actually do it. Language playas strong part in this cultural conditioning, because our beliefs are re-enforced through what we say, and how we say it. Societal Pressures Personal needs
PLACEBO effect and how to harness it in routine practice The placebo effect is basically due to deceit – where the patient is led to believe that the medication or management being offered is powerful and bound to work to achieve the desired effect, even though an inert substance is in fact being administered. It works on the doctor acting a strong belief in the treatment (which can be conscious or even unconscious) which persuades the patient’s beliefs and so enables them to put their faith into the management, and this act of putting a strong faith in a course of action is powerful enough to have an effect, even to the point of producing side effects if these are suggested to the patient. Of course if the patient is told that the treatment being offered is an inert substance and not the expected effective agent then this mechanism would not work. We first need to weed out those cases which would have got better anyway within the time period, where the improvement is then credited to the placebo (or drug etc in real life). Several pathways of activity have been suggested (put these in here). The challenge is how to use this “self-healing” pathway in a positive way where the patient is not fooled but encouraged to actively participate in the treatment. We are bringing in to play natural mechanisms within the person which can have a positive healing effect. Pain is an obvious example – my experience after the accident – many people have an outpouring of morphine like natural substances which relieve pain for a short period. Bio-feedback gives us another possible mechanism – quote papers on blood pressure and bio-feedback. Rename it the Faith Effect – look at the mechanism of faith we believe, we take faith actions and this leads to deeply held convictions. Can we switch on this faith effect without deceiving the patient, but getting them to cooperate. I believe we can. The following key principles should help us.
So how do we make positive use of this faith effect.
Part of the answer will be in the motivation and enabling of the individual’s “Personal coping resource” which includes such concepts as Sense of Coherence by Aaron Antonovsky and Locus of Control which will look at – Some of these measure personality characteristics, others coping mechanisms, others learned methods of how much the person can influence their own life. In helping people – we need to undertake the following steps –
Perceived Competence Measures Locus of Control Scales Time Time is the most important and precious commodity in health care – n o-one has enough time. Of course there is plenty of time, but it is taken up doing other things. So the issue is how do I give this a higher priority than the other medical tasks I am required to perform. And of course they are right – there is no spare time when HC professionals are sitting around wondering what to do. So time has to be made by taking it away from other tasks. The questions are –
To begin to introduce whole-person medicine we need to tackle these questions head on.
|
You may download a PDF file of this chapter.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated January 27, 2008 | Home > Handbook Index > Handbook Chapter 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||